I often get the feeling those people see everyone who voices dissent as one big amorphous blob. It’s as if every conversation on a topic is part of one long argument, and you get assigned every claim that anyone ever made. Almost like they watched that “moops” alt-right playbook video and drew the exact wrong conclusion.
I was under the impression it was the “Hillary warned us” and “Putin is behind everything” crowd, since it mirrors the MAGA saviour and conspiracy fantasies.
…I’m guessing this is another North Korea haircut story?
Have you considered “not voting for whoever is served to you is treason” messaging could also be a psyop to depress voter turn out by making people disgusted with politics in general?
For the umpteenth time, it turns out fascism is the frontier coming home.
Well, not send, per se, he was already there, he just happened to be the man to actually push the reforms through so he was kept.
It would seem the church is looking at it from the opposite direction: it reaches all the way into the confessional. Anything outside it should be fair game, it’s just the violation of the sacrament they object to - though I guess “go confess turn your self in” could count as “cause a report to be made”.
It even kinda makes sense. If a company C-levels can get away with what’s essentially several thousand counts of manslaughter because it wasn’t any one person, it’s this fictional legal entity that doesn’t really exist and the government just gives it millions whenever it’s in trouble - why don’t we all do it?
I believe the term is “prosecuted”.
Frankly, the problem with AI slop isn’t the AI, it’s the slop. We now get to see what all those “I have so many great ideas, if only I could draw, you’d see!” people’s ideas actually are, and it’s… this shit.
The problem is you’re not saying the magic words. Actually parsing an argument is out of fashion, so you gotta sprinkle your posts with stuff like “free Taiwan” or “fuck Putin” or whatever, so the LLM they paste your posts into to summarise them can understand them.
Now there’s a phrasing…