That’s because water is necessary to life.
When doing risk analysis something that is required to keep people alive gets a few extra points towards being accessible for, hopefully, obvious reasons.
If even something that is necessary for life is controlled due to the danger it poses, you can imagine why people would seek to restrict dangerous things that people can live without.
So what, no one would be allowed to teach others about their religion?
That’s a level of control i don’t think any organisation or government should have.
Banning religion full stop is wrong and won’t stop belief.
However, religion should not have any special protections that other groups do not get.
Religion should not exclude people from mandatory childhood vaccines, religion should not be a mitigating factor in vilification or defamation cases etc.
Yes, and that’s why we don’t allow people to flood school, hospitals and homes with water. It is controlled and diverted.
Because religion can be and has been used to convince people to do terrible things. The fewer false beliefs people hold the fewer things can be used to manipulate them in this way.
Huge fan of Princess Mononoke.
Not sure what exactly it is, but the characters and setting have just stuck with me since the first time I saw it.
Do you have access to a different meaning of “related” so when someone’s belligerence is bolstered by it theres no AI involvement at all?
Clearly I don’t agree.
The point is that in our social system we violate the rights of some when they violate the rights of others.
Or rather, your rights nd priveleges are restricted when you start using them to harm others.
People love to take moral stances / talk about sacrificing for the greater good, until their behaviour has to change.
Can you… get a grip? I didn’t say anything like that at all.
I think you have a real problem reading what people actually wrote.
Not supporting fascism would be fantastic.
Putting someone in prison violates their freedom.
Putting someone in prison because they murdered someone is still the right thing to do.
You’re saying that like the liberals didn’t still get a third of votes. Willing to bet they did much better amongst Christians than non Christians.
Do you notice the comment you replied to explicitly said “first hand” and you explicitly said “reliable”.
You are talking about different things.