Except it isn’t illegal to enslave people. It is 100% legal if used as punishment for a crime as decided by the state. It is literally encoded into the 13th Amendment

Those “successes” are simply concessions from the state to lull the population back into complacency.

Violence is a tool. It is neither inherently good nor bad. It is how that violence is used and perpetrated and the context around why it was employed is where the heart of the matter lies.

Someone who is violent against Nazis or those of equivalent ideology in self defense? Absolutely and unequivocally justifiable.

Someone employing state violence to detain civilians because they were born on the wrong side of an imaginary line? Absolutely unjustifiable and deserves to be stopped, even if it means employing violence in self/community defense.

Pretty much what all anarchist theory has been proposing, at least when it comes to revolutionary action.

This is about what I expected of a study like this.

You mean being able to have the confidence that you can ride a bike without being subjected potential bodily harm at the hands of an apathetic drivers means more people will choose to ride their bike?

Color me shook.

They do that shit on purpose to piss off the car behind them for daring to “tailgate”. I’ve had former friends and family who brag about it.

Literally putting a random person’s life on the line for a small bit of petty revenge at a perceived slight.

The law has been broken for a very long time. It’s been well past the time for a restructuring.

Why is this in World News? Take it to a MMA, Sports, or other sub that’s actually relevant.

You say that as if there is anything wrong with rioting against a fascist organization seeking to do harm to those in your community.

Yup. The only reason Greta isn’t dead or held captive is because of her celebrity status.

If she was just another no-name activist, she wouldn’t be on that plane to Paris.

This. While those deaths were notable and tragic, they weren’t “celebrity deaths”, which pains me to even say, but it is true.

Greta is essentially an international celebrity at this point, not just some noteworthy activist. Her death would be much more noticeable throughout the modern zeitgeist than a random activist who happened to be American.

100%

She is too high profile to have around the grunts, also is a very vocal woman who isn’t afraid to upset authority. One pissed off murderer that feels slighted ends up doing something to her and that’s a mountain which can’t be made into a mole hill like they have been doing.

the differences in phrasing, framing, and identify information and context that is or is not present, and also have a general background knowledge of the publication itself, as well as general background knowledge pertaining to the story itself.

This is the most damning part. I’ve tried talking to people to tell them about this but ever time I get the same braindead “it’s not that deep bruh” response. These idiots don’t even understand how or why this kind of information is important.

Literally sleep walking through life.

Goddamn that’s beautiful.

Literally “kidnapped in international waters”

32

It’s absolutely an age thing. Show was before my time but grew up in the heyday of 30 Seconds to Mars

Considering one of the core features of being right wing is to be against welfare and aid, yes, I categorically would assume those of the right are against the delivery.

Never heard of that show. Always knew him from the band growing up and was surprised as hell to learn he did film.

They would need the ability to think critically to understand how it reduces traffic. Sadly, they can’t think beyond two steps in front of their own faces.

He is the lead singer of “30 Seconds to Mars”. That’s where his fame came from originally.

His appearance in movies has always been a weird “let’s shove this famous guy from one media into this other one for publicity” kinda thing. Then for some reason he just stayed doing movies and here we are.