Don Piano

Usually more of a logarithmic relationship though

Either way, keeping at it is essential

Of course it would be D&D. Playing something more interesting would require commitment to a perspective.

Paranoia would be more thematically appropriate, of course.

Ah. It’s somewhat odd for me, as my love for and of nature, as well as (and in the same vein) my ideas about human potential and dignity come from a specifically un- if not anti-spiritual place.

Something like: The material world is not only beautiful (in a fundamental way, I don’t merely mean pretty like a forest on a hill, but also beautiful like all the interconnected systems that make it a forest), but also all there is, and that is part of the reason why caring about feeling beings is important.

But yeah, we always gotta make some judgement calls on who and what we exclude and include with the terms we use.

Note: I include a love of nature, humanism, etc. under the ‘spiritual’ label, as well as traditionally religiously spiritual.

Huh. Why?

Fewer, not none. Adhd for example tends to interfere with the pursuit of longer term goals in some ways, regardless of society’s pressures and expectations. Those make it asymmetrically harder on top of everything else.

The social model of disability is essential, but it’s not the only perspective to keep in mind.

Because that empirically tends to negatively interfere with rehabilitative functions of justice. If crime is bad, preventing crime is good, and stopping crime prevention therefore is bad.

Oh no, Macie’s wife

Can you conceive of other motivations?

Do you believe that the point of such assignments is because the teacher desires to read a couple dozen nigh-identical essays on the topic at hand?

Firings and jail time.

In lieu of that, high fines and firings.

Impression: That picture is useless compared to any of the actual points of the article. Also, it’s a cropped picture.

Yeah there is. The law isn’t run on cartoon logic where you can get around a ban by putting on a fake mustache and a hat.

https://dejure.org/gesetze/PartG/33.html

Re-forming with a new name is covered by the ban.

The rules they’d have to comply with to circumvent the ban are antithetical to what they are.

You can play the game, but flipping the table cannot be a legal move.

Don’t believe nazi propaganda about those things. They were largely inefficient and disorganized, they just predated others to fuel their goals. It’s one of the economic reasons for waging war on everyone: once you use up your local stolen wealth, you gotta raid other people’s. Nazi organizational structures were famously broken, with different redundant levels of political control pitted against each other, in line with social darwinist ideas.

And by far not all Nazis were true believers. Tons were “merely” playing along, because they thought they’d get something out of it. They often did, with the wealth of previously Jewish owned (and other) companies being handed to people close to the leadership.

These are parallels, not contrasts.