Removed by mod

You’re proving my point for me. Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs doesn’t include meal choice, only that physiological needs are met.

and people need more than nutrients

Someone failed their science classes.

You mean kerb?

You just derided them for mockingly copying what you said while unironically copying what they said. JFC, this is pure cringe, zero self awareness gold.

ROFLMAO

Colour me surprised, Bloomcole with another shit-tier take. I only don’t block them because they by far have my lowest Voyager tracked user score, -83 as of this comment, and I’m curious to see how low it’ll go simply by incidental Bloomcole exposure.

Someone get this chap to run for office!

My hone? All my cutlery is already sharp, thank you very much.

I think we might have found this guy’s Lemmy account (YouTube news video).

Meth and Lemmy: not even once.

What does any of that even mean? Are you okay?

You need a /s, I’ve actually seen people honestly make arguments like this.

How long since you last went outside, mate?

I first questioned why two billion cats have Instagram accounts, then realized there can’t be 2 billion Egyptian Maus in all the world, much less on Instagram.

Then you should take a second look. It’s on the chart and directly referenced in the text.

… can I not?

I think you’re missing a little /s or similar there to denote you’re joking, right?

I decided to give it a few days before checking back in and have decided to block this community. The mod’s banning of the “brigade” of two .ml people in response to their compliance to the mod’s requests got me looking deeper into their behavior. They’re unabashedly biased and overall a poor moderator. They request responses and either ban users because the response wasn’t what they wanted to hear or just don’t respond.

The great thing about Lemmy is being able to start a new community. I might do just that.

Two people constitutes brigading? By that standard, you ought to ban the lot of us from .world!

I intended to respond but this lot beat me to the punch. The only thing I’ll emphasize is The Sun, a tabloid rag with a history of false reporting, is the only original reporting. The other outlets are parroting them, some without attribution by simply stating “according to reports” like the above linked NZ Herald, or indirectly by attributing to a report which attributes it to another and so on, until it ultimately gets back to The Sun, like in this India Times article.

NYT: “Dictator Kim Jong Un has declared that serving the sausage was an act of treason, The Sun reports…”

Vice: “One thing to keep in mind about this report is that you have to take it with a grain of salt. It originates from The Sun, a tabloid that doesn’t have a ton of credibility.” -Emphasis mine because it’s funny-

The Mirror: . “One vendor, who is based in the northern province of Ryanggang, stressed that authorities have been monitoring them closely. The vendor told The Sun…”

Regardless, none of this really matters. This “call for commentary” appears to be your attempt to legitimize your moderation as we’re doing scarcely more than the bloke you banned for answering your request. You’re doing less. Should you be banned?

If you can’t be impartial, or at least honest about it when you aren’t, consider handing the job to someone who can.