if you browse the play store on a web browser you can open app links directly to bypass this. for now.

you have described how contextual authorial intent works, yes

it is objectively true that it’s irresponsible to answer as he did, that doesnt mean he shouldnt have done it from a journalistic perspective, but certainly for anyone without the clear intent of potentially being arrested. Dont talk to cops.

what kinda glowie nonsense is “dont talk to cops” now fascism? dont talk to cops, get a lawyer.

If everyone gave up on a place when futures there look bleak, there wouldnt be a place left in the world worth living in.

why do you care that someone didnt say it was worse enough? “x is a problem, if y is true then z is a problem” -> “why didnt you talk about x”

silly.

Because these are often sold with profile building features, for example, recall. Recall is sold as “local only” with profile building features. So it continues to be centralized pii that is a point of failure. As the quote says, as i said.

I don’t care if your language model is “local-only” and runs on the user’s device. If it can build a profile of the user (regardless of accuracy) through their smartphone usage, that can and will be used against people.

emphasis mine from the text you quoted…

building and centralizing pii is indeed a privacy point of failure. what’s not to understand?

i see, the computer version of a prehensile tail…

if you give up before they even start then you lose without trying, and then they will still find ways to arrest you.