• 1 Post
  • 45 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 9th, 2023

help-circle





  • I don’t think free will can be dismissed just because the framework that it runs on is deterministic.

    Let’s say you program a text editor. A computer runs the program, but the computer has no influence on what text the user is going to write.

    I think that consciousness is a user like that. It runs on deterministic hardware but it’s not necessarily deterministic due to that. It might be for other reasons, but the laws of physics isn’t it, because physics doesn’t prohibit free will from existing.

    Consciousness is wildly complex. It’s a self illusion and we really have no good idea about where decisions even come from.

    If it is deterministic, it would have to involve every single atom in the universe that in one way or another have influenced the person. Wings of a butterfly and light from distant stars etc. Attempting to predict it would require a simulation of everything. That leads to other questions. If a simulation is a 1:1 replica of the real thing, which one is then real and what happens if we run it backwards, can we see what caused the big bang, etc.

    So, even if this is about free will, the enquiry falls short on trying to figure out what even causes anything to happen at all.

    If we are happy with accepting that the universe was caused by something before or outside the universe, then it’s really easy to point in that direction and say that free will also comes from there - somewhere outside the deterministic physics.

    Of course the actual universe and the laws of physics are really not separate as data and functions. The data itself contains the instructions. Any system that can contain itself that way is incomplete as proved by Kurt Gödel’s incompleteness theorem. Truths do exist that can’t be proven so perhaps the concept of free will is an example of such a thing, or maybe it’s not. The point is that we can’t rule it out, just because it exists in a deterministic system.

    Personally I don’t think it matters all that much. Similarly to how we can only ever experience things that exists inside of the universe,or see the light that hits our eye, we can also only ever hope to experience free will on the level of our own consciousness, even if we acknowledge that it is influenced by all kinds of other things from all levels from atoms to the big bang.



  • bstix@feddit.dktoYou Should Know@lemmy.worldYSK How to sew on a button
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Step 8. The toothpick is used to loosen the loops and make distance between the button and the fabric. This is necessay. The button would be too tight to function properly otherwise.

    Step 9 is to remove the toothpick and sew upwards under the button, but not through the button.

    Steps 10-12. Since the sewing isn’t tightened down, you’ll need to secure it by wrapping the string around it a couple of times. (This is why you don’t sew through the button in step 9).

    Steps 13-rest. Sew through the existing loops and tie a knot to secure the thread.





  • It’s not directly banned in Denmark. It’s basically non-existent, and as such difficult to find people who cares enough about banning it.

    Indirectly it is already illegal, because it’s illegal to treat anyone for anything against their will. This includes children.

    However, there are still people who send their children to a therapist or a doctor. I don’t know if a ban would change their minds in any way. Perhaps it’s better that the parents get to have that conversation with a doctor instead of just being angry at a law and seeking help at alternative places through religion or whatever. They’d probably do that with or without a law anyway, so if anything, it’s actually better if they have the opportunity to talk to a professional therapist first without just getting told off.

    Politicians don’t want to deal with it. They’re afraid the backlash from people who are against all things “woke”, would be bigger than the support from anyone who actually cares about the virtue signaling.

    If the practice is actually widespread and secretly done in religious circles, we would benefit from hearing those stories.



  • I think of it more like the classic half full or half empty glass, but with a little extra twist.

    • I can’t do anything right and that’s okay because no one can.
    • I can do things just as good as everyone else.

    The first is funny, but it’s a poor excuse to avoid responsibility and accepting that nothing gets done. The second is better, but it can dangerous if it over promotes self confidence.

    It’s a saying that pops into my head whenever I have the option to take responsibility for something. It’s okay to “fake it till you make” if the alternative is worse .

    More often than not, taking responsibility for stuff I only barely know about has given me a much better understanding about it than just sitting back and letting some other person half-ass it. It’s very rare that anyone knows everything in advance, and I’d be very cautious when someone claims that they do.

    Anyway, this joke has sometimes helped me in those leap of faith situations and it has lead to a positive experience everytime.


  • Perhaps the paradox is that if you find someone who actually knows what they’re doing, then who of all the people who don’t know what they’re doing will even know that the first person knows?

    People will tell you that you’re right or wrong based on their own experience which is likely to be even more wrong than someone who is actually right.


  • News on car sales are always presented as monthly or by quarter.

    That way, everyone gets a participation trophy by breaking the records in the period that they actually deliver a new model to the tarmac.

    I don’t blame the news outlets. Reporting on record car sales is kind of boring when the 1966 Toyota Corolla is still the most sold car.

    I have no doubt that Tesla actually managed to peak for a while in the category “American sales of electric pick-ups trucks”.


  • Driving manual is not difficult, but unlike the opposite scenario, it’s not something you can learn with only short instructions.

    It does take time to develop the motor skills in order do it without thinking about it. The practice wlll take maybe an afternoon or two if you do nothing else. I’d advise you to do it over more than one day to allow yourself to sleep on it and come back at it

    Once you’ve learned it, you’ll never think about it again though.