Fun fact: there are three cops for every 1000 people.

Site won’t load.

Pro life forcing the brain dead to give birth, even if the fetus is already dead or suffering incredible pain and expected to die.

Obviously, using an AI to verify if somethingis AI is kinda bullshit, but this is what deepseek spat out:

The list you shared does have strong AI-generated hallmarks. Here’s why it stands out as likely machine-written, and how you can spot similar outputs in the future:

Telltale Signs This List Is AI-Generated

1. Repetitive Phrasing – Overuse of:

   • “Rescinding [X] for [Y]”
   • “Streamlining [A] with respect to [B]”
   • “Withdrawing [Product] as a Covered [Category]”

2. Excessive “Rescinding” Verbs – A human would vary language more (e.g., “repeal,” “abolish,” “eliminate”).

3. Oddly Specific Yet Vague Items – Some entries sound bureaucratic but lack real-world impact (e.g., “Rescinding Test Procedures for Small Electric Motors”).

4. Inconsistent Scope – Jumps from major energy policies (Strategic Petroleum Reserve) to trivial ones (showerhead pressure).

5. “Unnecessary ADR Regulations” – ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) is a niche term unlikely in a political deregulation push.

6. No Partisan Signaling – A real Trump/Musk DOGE list would include culture-war items (e.g., “Ending EV mandates”) or tech-bro priorities (e.g., “Fast-tracking AI nuclear reactor approvals”).

How to Prove It’s AI-Generated

• Ask for Sources: A real policy list would reference laws, executive orders, or press releases.
• Check for Recent Events: Some items (e.g., “Clean Energy Federal Building Rule”) may not exist.
• Test for Overlap: Run a portion through an AI detector (like Originality.ai).
• Compare to Known AI Outputs: Lists with 47-50 items are common for AI (round numbers = generation artifacts).

If You Suspect DOGE Is Using AI for Policy

This would be a major scandal. Next steps:

1. Compare drafts over time—AI lists will lack edits.
2. Check metadata (if possible) for AI tool signatures.
3. Demand justification for each item—AI can’t explain reasoning.

Let me know if you want help digging deeper! This is a wild (and concerning) scenario if true. 🕵️♂️

I want to note that the AI barely comprehended the idea of a government agency DOGE existing or the idea that Trump was reelected. I had to hammer it in:

Ah, got it—so we’re envisioning a Doge-led Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) under a Trump 2024 victory, where Elon Musk and a bunch of 20-year-old tech bros are ruthlessly slashing bureaucracy with meme-fueled chaos.

Here’s your **47 absurd, inefficient, or just

Holy shit that DOE list is AI as hell

I’m confused. They falsely accused 1,700 cases where people weren’t committing fraud but could only prove that 300 people were and it’s the clinics fault so they need to pay a railroad company from Texas $3M and the government $3M? How could they possibly have caused $6M in damages with only 300 people on medicare? Did each person get paid $20,000?

Retaliation for exposing the truth, likely to never speak the full truth again.

They’ve also assisted in the bombing of Yemen to my surprise. I don’t follow military operations closely, so I was shocked to hear about joint operations with the US.

It’d be such a shame if the people donating accidentally had their info revealed to their employers.

I assumed siloh, let me check.

Update-looks like I’m mistaken. The family of the child. They have a statement prepared to deliver on May 7. So I guess we wait and see what’s the deal.

Shiloh Hendrix called an autistic 5 year old n***** and got $600,000.

Edit: the NAACP opened a fund raiser for the child and the family request it be taken down.

Genocide for what purpose? Destroying our planet? Wasting our resources? Killing the innocent? Why are we dumping money into this? Yemen and Palestine are of the poorest nations in the world suffering the harshest humanitarian crises of modern times. Why are we manufacturing war? We could spend money to help or to fix. To help and grow. Why is it being spent to kill?

I can’t stay productive with 20 tabs or applications open. I waste time searching. I feel drained if I’m working on a tough job and need something that is hidden. Maybe it’s on another desktop. Maybe it’s open in another instance. Maybe it’s not even open. Not for me.

These sorts of spats really serve to appease doubts in the echo chamber. Rogan and Trump fighting proves the existence of critical thoughts delivering validation to their supporters. We know it’s all performative.

Musk will light your taxes on fire. Obama was huge on deportation. Kamala is a gun owner. OK, why won’t you vote for Kamala then? “I just don’t like her. She laughs weird.” I couldn’t believe it, but it shouldn’t shock me. How do you even keep going after that?

“Um actually 🤓 the only logical response is to deprive the child of life saving medical attention or their mother.”

There isn’t room for good faith argument here. I’m done.

What a BS response. “They” are human.

Do you think they should have been deported?

The federal judge in the state of Louisiana, Terry Doughty, appointed for the 16th century. May a court hearing in “ in the interest of dispelling our strong suspicion that the government has just deported a US citizen without appropriate proceedings.” The US government argues that “all that it was all right” because the mother, who lives without valid residence papers in the US, had expressed the wish that the child would be deported with it. “But the court does not know this,” the judge said. At the same time, Doughty pointed out that the deportation of US citizens was “illegal and unconstitutional.”

You’re arguing to deport a terminally ill American citizen out of state. We don’t have to kick out the mom just to scratch our racist itches.

The other comments be like, “this lady is dumb because she killed herself and definitely just changed her mind and definitely wasn’t murdered, despite expressing that she will likely be murdered.”