For the impeachment itself, assuming the Democrats all vote for it, Musk only needs to buy 9 republicans.
For the trial, he needs to get 20 republicans for the two thirds. It’s not going to be cheap, but it sounds doable.
The problem is that leaves Vance in charge, and a focused autocrat is not an upgrade.
Germany it’s because of the holocaust (funny that it never translates into wanting to make a safe homeland for Roma people at all costs).
US it’s because of Christian death cults wanting a new temple in Jerusalem because they think it will bring Jesus back.
Benny was caught giving weapons to the Islamic Fucking State and for some reason decided to own it.
Is https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10630722/ real science for you enough?
This announcement doesn’t exist in a vacuum.
The solution is turning this on its head and having a law saying which weapons are allowed.
Granted it’s hard with how the archaic constitution of the US is written and how creatively the conservative judges read it, but decisions like this give room for states to try more tiered access to weapons.
Which still has no material impact on his well being and keeps most people distracted from his behaviours from all kinds of inappropriate conduct at Microsoft to his efforts to rehabilitate Epstein after his first conviction, with a bunch of economic crimes and things that should be economic crimes in the middle.
I think it’s Samurai Bringer.
Despite the crap labour and business practices, the US is an high wage economy. For non perishable goods, companies either manage to compete on quality or they sink because they can’t compete on price.
That’s how it effectively works in most of the Western world. The head of state usually issue pardons but on advise of the government (especially in countries where the head of state is not the head of government) or an independent comission.
So, shall we skip a step and put Apartheid South Africa level sanctions on Israel?
They will respect your choice, ignoring it would be a stupid risk when they have a loophole so obvious they are open about it. Even if you opt out, any content about you shared by someone that didn’t will be used to train their models.
CDNs and distrubuted clouds make flagfox unreliable for most large sites.
That’s were the ambiguity comes into play. The laws related to cookies want to allow things like cookies for fraud prevention and antibot protection, the problem starts when the business people say the personalised ad revenue makes it legitimate and the developers and product managers decide that having a bazillion trackers making their job a little easier makes it absolutely essential.
Yes.
Rejecting cookies without asking every time requires a cookie and that is clearly legitimate interest. The problem with legitimate interest is that it’s not well defined enough and then you have companies claiming that Adsense personalization is an absolute necessity for their website.
That’s a big leap considering the article mentions this is about his position on an ongoing ethnic cleansing and not about his religious views - though I suspect his religious views are colouring how he views the acceptability of crimes against humanity when targeting some groups.
I have very little sympathy for religion in public spaces but I’ve even less for pro-genocide people.
When you are talking about diplomats, very little.
Would accepting a pardon expose them to civil law suits?
Poor dude, he’s illiterate and doesn’t even have a radio or TV.
*Portuguese. We also use it as informal greeting in Portugal, and I’m pretty sure it’s universal to all portuguese speaking countries.