Which still has no material impact on his well being and keeps most people distracted from his behaviours from all kinds of inappropriate conduct at Microsoft to his efforts to rehabilitate Epstein after his first conviction, with a bunch of economic crimes and things that should be economic crimes in the middle.
I think it’s Samurai Bringer.
Despite the crap labour and business practices, the US is an high wage economy. For non perishable goods, companies either manage to compete on quality or they sink because they can’t compete on price.
That’s how it effectively works in most of the Western world. The head of state usually issue pardons but on advise of the government (especially in countries where the head of state is not the head of government) or an independent comission.
So, shall we skip a step and put Apartheid South Africa level sanctions on Israel?
They will respect your choice, ignoring it would be a stupid risk when they have a loophole so obvious they are open about it. Even if you opt out, any content about you shared by someone that didn’t will be used to train their models.
CDNs and distrubuted clouds make flagfox unreliable for most large sites.
That’s were the ambiguity comes into play. The laws related to cookies want to allow things like cookies for fraud prevention and antibot protection, the problem starts when the business people say the personalised ad revenue makes it legitimate and the developers and product managers decide that having a bazillion trackers making their job a little easier makes it absolutely essential.
Yes.
Rejecting cookies without asking every time requires a cookie and that is clearly legitimate interest. The problem with legitimate interest is that it’s not well defined enough and then you have companies claiming that Adsense personalization is an absolute necessity for their website.
That’s a big leap considering the article mentions this is about his position on an ongoing ethnic cleansing and not about his religious views - though I suspect his religious views are colouring how he views the acceptability of crimes against humanity when targeting some groups.
I have very little sympathy for religion in public spaces but I’ve even less for pro-genocide people.
When you are talking about diplomats, very little.
Would accepting a pardon expose them to civil law suits?
Poor dude, he’s illiterate and doesn’t even have a radio or TV.
Taxis? You know, the regulated alternative that’s not in the process of doing a bait and switch by selling services at a loss until competition dies and then increase the prices.
It’s only illegal for instances based in Romania. Romanian laws don’t apply to people and services outside of Romania.
Because she’s an useful idiot for a bunch of oligarchs.
Non credible defense is leaking.
I wonder what Polish farmers think will happen to their farms if Ukraine falls and Russian tanks start driving over them.
The solution is turning this on its head and having a law saying which weapons are allowed.
Granted it’s hard with how the archaic constitution of the US is written and how creatively the conservative judges read it, but decisions like this give room for states to try more tiered access to weapons.