Not without someone getting a ban.
When I get bored with the conversation/tired of arguing I will simply tersely agree with you and then stop responding. I’m too old for this stuff.
- 0 Posts
- 10 Comments
H.P. Lovecraft entered the chat
mycodesucks@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Men are opening up about mental health to AI instead of humansEnglish83·3 days agoYou know, I don’t even disagree with that sentiment in principle, but expecting people to suffer when they could benefit from a technology because they only see the threats and dangers makes them no different than antivaxxers.
It is possible and logically consistent to urge caution and condemn the worst abuses of technology without throwing the baby out with the bath water.
But no… I guess because the awful aspects of the technology as far as IP theft are - rightfully - the biggest focus, sorry, poor people, you just have to keep sucking it up and powering through! You want empathy, fork over the $100 an hour!
mycodesucks@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Men are opening up about mental health to AI instead of humansEnglish1218·3 days agoRemoved by mod
mycodesucks@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Men are opening up about mental health to AI instead of humansEnglish478·3 days agoLook, if you can afford therapy, really, fantastic for you. But the fact is, it’s an extremely expensive luxury, even at poor quality, and sharing or unloading your mental strain with your friends or family, particularly when it is ongoing, is extremely taxing on relationships. Sure, your friends want to be there for you when they can, but it can put a major strain depending on how much support you need. If someone can alleviate that pressure and that stress even a little bit by talking to a machine, it’s in extremely poor taste and shortsighted to shame them for it. Yes, they’re willfully giving up their privacy, and yes, it’s awful that they have to do that, but this isn’t like sharing memes… in the hierarchy of needs, getting the pressure of those those pent up feelings out is important enough to possibly be worth the trade-off. Is it ideal? Absolutely not. Would it be better if these systems were anonymized? Absolutely. But humans are natural anthropomorphizers. They develop attachments and build relationships with inanimate objects all the time. And a really good therapist is more a reflection for you to work through things yourself anyway, mostly just guiding your thoughts towards better patterns of thinking. There’s no reason the machine can’t do that, and while it’s not as good as a human, it’s a HUGE improvement on average over nothing at all.
mycodesucks@lemmy.worldto Mildly Interesting@lemmy.world•You can now get paid 5,000 yen for your poop in Japan, but only if your poop is good enough12·7 days agoFound the non-European.
mycodesucks@lemmy.worldto Showerthoughts@lemmy.world•One of the big dangers of getting romantically involved with AI is the cost3·9 days agoI think we already have a term for leasing a girlfriend…
We’ve got a term for the middle-man gatekeepers who collect the money too.
mycodesucks@lemmy.worldto Showerthoughts@lemmy.world•One of the big dangers of getting romantically involved with AI is the cost10·10 days agoI hope everyone learns the lesson from the Japanese dude who married his hologram just to watch her die when the service was shut down…
If your girlfriend isn’t running on your air-gapped hardware offline, she’s not your girlfriend.
mycodesucks@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•SpaceX's Starship blows up ahead of 10th test flightEnglish1·12 days agoIn this case you happen to be right on both counts.
mycodesucks@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•SpaceX's Starship blows up ahead of 10th test flightEnglish4·13 days agoSeparating the message from the messenger is a key skill. A right answer doesn’t become wrong because it comes from a jerk.
deleted by creator