I’m the end, you simply can’t fix corporatism.

soooo…you’re not very good at finding information that isn’t presented to you, evidently.

At least they choose the utmost ironic username for it.

People have private conversations in public but, if I join in, I’m the crazy one~

Like, – yes – those people will have to accept that people may overhear them while talking about their subject but this isn’t a new phenomenon. People have always done this.

This is just the dynamic of public spaces.

Everything is political; how much you notice really is just a metric of how much a particular subject effects you.

This is such a great example.

I truly wonder what’s going through someone’s head when they downvote purely factual statements. I didn’t even give an opinion here.

This and the guy with the small feet. I can’t tell if I just browse Lemmy too much but I swear I’ve seen their posts no less than 4 times reposted.

But I never see anyone say anything about having seen them before.

For a century now, the option has been at some point between 7 and 16, at the diocese’s discretion. I received mine around 16; 13 sounds like an outlier, to me.

https://youtu.be/IV20B6bU8Pc

Yeah; I don’t have the spoons to give a supporting link but I remember that being borne out in the fox-domestication experiment, as well (along with other traits that seemed to align with the domestication process – as well –, such as floppy, folded ears); same reason domesticated cattle have developed spots.

For a second, I read your fruit predilection literally and was like, “Is…watermelon controversial, now? Are they [the people who banned you] cartoonishly racist?”

I follow you, now; sucks but expected…