ikt@aussie.zone to

LocalLLaMA@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 3 months ago

Trump administration reportedly considers a US DeepSeek ban | TechCrunch

4

Trump administration reportedly considers a US DeepSeek ban | TechCrunch

ikt@aussie.zone to

LocalLLaMA@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 3 months ago

The Trump administration is considering barring Americans from accessing AI models created by the Chinese AI lab, DeepSeek.

The Trump administration is considering new restrictions on the Chinese AI lab DeepSeek that would limit it from buying Nvidia’s AI chips and potentially bar Americans from accessing its AI services, The New York Times reported on Wednesday.

Chat

Daefsdeda@sh.itjust.works
link
fedilink
English
arrow-up
0·
3 months ago
Yeah it is easy to make things cheaper by making it so that factory workers have only one day off a month, with 7 day work weeks.
- Oskar@piefed.social
  link
  fedilink
  English
  arrow-up
  1·
  3 months ago
  The whole point of US and European companies moving manufacturing to China.

LocalLLaMA@sh.itjust.works

localllama@sh.itjust.works

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

Welcome to LocalLLaMA! Here we discuss running and developing machine learning models at home. Lets explore cutting edge open source neural network technology together.

Get support from the community! Ask questions, share prompts, discuss benchmarks, get hyped at the latest and greatest model releases! Enjoy talking about our awesome hobby.

As ambassadors of the self-hosting machine learning community, we strive to support each other and share our enthusiasm in a positive constructive way.

Rules:

Rule 1 - No harassment or personal character attacks of community members. I.E no namecalling, no generalizing entire groups of people that make up our community, no baseless personal insults.

Rule 2 - No comparing artificial intelligence/machine learning models to cryptocurrency. I.E no comparing the usefulness of models to that of NFTs, no comparing the resource usage required to train a model is anything close to maintaining a blockchain/ mining for crypto, no implying its just a fad/bubble that will leave people with nothing of value when it burst.

Rule 3 - No comparing artificial intelligence/machine learning to simple text prediction algorithms. I.E statements such as "llms are basically just simple text predictions like what your phone keyboard autocorrect uses, and they’re still using the same algorithms since <over 10 years ago>.

Rule 4 - No implying that models are devoid of purpose or potential for enriching peoples lives.

Visibility: Public

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

1 user / day
77 users / week
261 users / month
854 users / 6 months
1 local subscriber
3.31K subscribers
99 Posts
388 Comments
Modlog